If You Have $4 and You Spend $7… [Living in an Obama Nation]

Frightening, but not all that surprising. (HT: Ryan Griffith)

As the Obama administration pushes through Congress its $800 billion deficit-spending economic stimulus plan, the American public is largely unaware that the true deficit of the federal government already is measured in trillions of dollars, and in fact its $65.5 trillion in total obligations exceeds the gross domestic product of the world.

I checked with someone I trust on financial and economic matters, and while it’s difficult to know the exact numbers, the basic premise of the article is sound. And in case you missed it: We owe more money than exists in the world. Only the United States government could accomplish such a feat.

When I read the story, it reminded me of Matt Chandler’s talk at the recent Desiring God Conference for Pastors. At one point, he cracked a joke about debt in which he imagined a hypothetical Christian worship leader writing a song that said, “If you have $4 and you spend $7, that’s dumb.”

So what is it if you have a couple trillion, but you spend 65 trillion? Oh, and what if, technically-speaking, the only work you did in order to get it was promising people that you would give them things, and that you did such lofty work as the representatives of the people who will inevitably pay for your insanity?

I love the last line of the story.

“The federal government is bankrupt,” Williams told WND. “In a post-Enron world, if the federal government were a corporation such as General Motors, the president and senior Treasury officers would be in federal penitentiary.”

For related thoughts on the Government’s game of Grabby-Grabby, see this one by Doug Wilson.

Responding to a Civilization in Decline as Christians [Sexualotry]

(For background on this post, see here.) I mentioned that I would get to some recommendations about how to respond to the potential (and in my mind, probable) collision of sexual “liberation” and shocking brutality. Here’s just a short list.

1. Remember that judgment begins with the household of God. Expecting the broader culture to conform to God’s standards when half the church is neck deep in all kinds of sexual foolishness is a classic example of putting carts before horses. Paul has some pretty harsh words for those who berate idolators while robbing their temples (Rom 2:17ff). When the salt loses its taste, God throws it out in the street so that it’s trampled underfoot. How then shall its saltiness be restored?

2. Through heartfelt repentance. Let us never forget that God is ever and always ready to turn and forgive. “Now is the favorable time; now is the day of salvation.” So let us avoid falling into any sort of fatalistic traps that assume that the trajectory we’re on determines our destiny. We may be rolling down the hill, picking up steam, but God is able to make grace abound to us and kick this big ball of culture back the other direction, often in response to the penitent cries of his people.

3. Demonstrate some antithesis. Following repentance, the greatest impact we can have on the culture is to actually be a city on the hill. Let there be a clear difference between sexual relationships inside and outside the church. We need strong, godly husbands, who take responsibility for their strong, godly wives, who joyfully submit to their strong, godly husbands, who…The world is not hungering for a slightly sanitized version of the same rotten trash that everyone else is serving. So settle these things in your own mind now. Purity until marriage. Fidelity and covenant-keeping love for a lifetime.

4. Be faithful where God plants you. When confronted with the depravity and brokenness that is endemic and multiplying in God’s world, the main question that you should ask is this: what is God requiring of me now? What is right in front of my face that God is calling me to do? Resist the pull toward abstractions and airy ideologies. Get incarnational dirt under your fingernails. Go local. Be faithful here, and God will take care of there.

5. Resist the temptation to despair because the world keeps getting in the same hell-bound handbasket. Yes, idolatry is self-destructive and it is frustrating, angering, and grievous to watch God’s image-bearers desecrate themselves and others. Our hearts should break over the futility and defamation in the world. But we must never despair. You are not responsible to change the world. You are responsible to trust and obey where God has placed you.

6. While living faithfully, we must recover a real prophetic voice, as opposed to the limp-wristed prophetic whisper that is tamed by smooth strokes and soothing words from the idolatrous establishment. Christians must never sacrifice the proclamation of Jesus’ lordship for a seat at the multi-culti table. This doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t ever sit down with the world of unbelief; it does mean that we should always do so as thoroughgoing, Christ-confessing Christians. With any luck, they will be throwing tomatoes at us before we’re done with our salad.

7. Insofar as is possible, rescue those who are being taken away to death; hold back those who are stumbling to the slaughter. Draw upon the mighty grace of God and refuse to faint in the day of adversity (Proverbs 24:10-11). This includes (among others) the unborn, their desperate mothers, women enslaved through sex trafficking, child-prostitutes, orphans, and the list goes on.

8. Take a lesson from the Proverbs 31 woman and “laugh at the time to come.” When Jesus considers the rulers and authorities amassed against him, he scoffs and laughs at them in derision (Psalm 2). Though things may look bleak now, remember: All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Jesus. That’s unbelievable news. We must deal with painful and wicked reality, but we mustn’t broker in gloom and doom. Satan’s doom is sure. The Crucified Lord is risen!

9. Weep with those who weep. Rejoice with those who rejoice. Our tears should have a deep, confident joy undergirding them, just as our joy must be textured by the broken-hearted sorrow of life in a fallen world. Ours is a cruciform Easter-faith. We are called to live crucified lives by the power of the resurrection. The Christian life is full of such exhilarating impossibilities.

10. Pray often for an outpouring of God’s Spirit upon the world and a release from God’s chastening judgment. Rebellious blindness holds sway in so many places in this world. Plead with God to lift his judgment and unleash his storehouses of mercy. Pray confidently with the knowledge that , if he so chooses, God could drown the world in grace.

The Globo-Obanomics Report [Living in an Obama Nation]

Trying to understand economics is somewhat of a hobby of mine. I’m no expert, so all analyses should be taken with a huge shaker of salt. I’ve read some good books on the subject, books that make sense to me and seem to jive nicely with The Book. So periodically, I’ll put together a post like this that highlights things that I find on the internets.

1. In a post that was practically made for Unintended Consequences, Will Wilkinson highlights the fallout of the government’s past push for home-ownership for every American. In a nutshell,

Government-subsidized borrowing gave us the housing bubble, precipitated financial Armageddon, helped prompt recession and mass unemployment. But, as the infomercials say, that’s not all! By zealously pushing home-ownership, federal housing policy has pinned to the map many now-jobless Americans who otherwise would have moved to find new work.

In other words, the government forced banks and lending companies to lower their standards so that more people could “have a piece of the American Dream.” People bought more house than they could afford, the housing bubble burst, the economy cratered, those same people are now losing their jobs, and…. they can’t move to find new jobs because they’re stuck in their piece of the American Dream. And no one saw it coming.

2. Here’s a little historical perspective on the relationship between government action in the New Deal and the prolonging of the Depression Previously Known as The Great.

Why wasn’t the Depression followed by a vigorous recovery, like every other cycle? It should have been. The economic fundamentals that drive all expansions were very favorable during the New Deal…So what stopped a blockbuster recovery from ever starting? The New Deal. Some New Deal policies certainly benefited the economy by establishing a basic social safety net through Social Security and unemployment benefits, and by stabilizing the financial system through deposit insurance and the Securities Exchange Commission. But others violated the most basic economic principles by suppressing competition, and setting prices and wages in many sectors well above their normal levels. All told, these antimarket policies choked off powerful recovery forces that would have plausibly returned the economy back to trend by the mid-1930s.

Well, at least we learned our lesson.

3. And now for a little economic apocalypticism from Peter Schiff. In the short interview on the left side of the screen, Schiff thinks the economic “stimulus” will be “an unmitigated disaster.” He predicts a crisis of the dollar, hyper-inflation, and the collapse of the current consumer economy resulting in an Even Greater Depression. I’m wary of Chicken-Little-style sermons, but Schiff has been predicting a collapse like this for some time, and he seems to have more economic sense than both houses of Congress.

4. Finally, if you’re like me, you listen to someone like Schiff and you start to panic a little. “What happens if the economy does go belly up?” Anxiety starts to well up in the heart, sin crouches at the door, and you start to get the economic equivalent of a bad case of indigestion. If that happens, I would heartily commend John Piper’s message “What Is the Recession For?” from a couple of weeks ago, as well as a couple of posts from Doug Wilson (here and here).

Remember: The Market is not sovereign; it does not run the world. Jesus does, and of all people, that should give those who belong to him a mighty dose of mind-blowing, soul-anchoring peace.

Giving Gratitude A Helping Hand [Randomonium]

One of my aims in blogging is to try to increase gratitude in the hearts of Christians. God is very kind to us in innumerable ways every day, and all we can do is murmur about how bad it is. I regularly pray that God would make me a more grateful person, not simply that I would thank him for huge things (like the little boy in my wife’s womb), but that I would just be a more grateful person.

I want to find evidences of grace everywhere. In that spirit, watch this clip from Conan O’Brien the other night as Louis C.K. gives gratitude a helping hand.

You Knew It Was Coming [Living in an Obama Nation]

They want the children first.

From a Borders Bookstore in Dallas:

3276778225_1d056a738d

Top 25 Conservative Movies of Last 25 Years

Over at NRO’s The Corner, they pulled together the Top 25 Conservative Movies of the Last 25 Years. (By “conservative,” I believe they mean politically, socially, or economically, as opposed to theologically.)

25. Gran Torino
24. Team America: World Police
23. United 93
22. Brazil
21. Heartbreak Ridge
20. Gattaca
19. We Were Soldiers
18. The Edge
17. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
16. Master and Commander
15. Red Dawn
14. A Simple Plan
13. Braveheart
12. The Dark Knight
11. The Lord of the Rings
10. Ghostbusters
9. Blast from the Past
8. Juno
7. The Pursuit of Happyness
6. Groundhog Day
5. 300
4. Forrest Gump
3. Metropolitan
2. The Incredibles
1. The Lives of Others

For a list of Also-Rans, see here.

What others would you add to the list?

Posted in Randomonium. Tags: . 1 Comment »

“Tomorrow, Tomorrow”: A New New Deal For Valentine’s Day [Surprised by Joe]

So Jen and I went to see theĀ  Annie: The Broadway Musical last night. Having never seen theĀ  movie, I wasn’t sure what to expect. Of course, it was Kid’s Night at the Orpheum, and the little boy sitting next to us was almost as entertaining as the show itself.

dsc000631

The actress playing Annie did a great job and the show had some fun little laughs. But perhaps the funniest part of the show was when Annie goes to the White House with her soon-to-be adoptive father, financial heavyweight Oliver Warbucks, and inspires FDR to conceive of the New Deal. Everyone in the Oval Office is all doom and gloom until Annie comes in, sings “Tomorrow” on Roosevelt’s desk, and awakens the innovative juices of the President’s Men.

FDR’s Brain Trust decides to create a bunch of government jobs filling potholes and building dams in order to get people off of welfare and back to work, so that they can “start paying taxes again” (an actual line in the play). Why it’s a good idea to have the government pay people so that people can turn around and pay the government right back is never addressed, nor do they say where the money will come from in the first place. But boy, was the little red-head cute!

In any event, Annie saves the day, is adopted by Daddy Warbucks, the titan of big business, who then joins forces with FDR’s big government to sing the show’s finale, “A New Deal For Christmas,” complete with a list of government programs that will “fill every stocking with laughter,” just as soon as the government waves the printing wand and the magic money appears. I think it would make a great Obama campaign ad.

I kid you not. I mean the show has Republican business leaders getting in bed with a Democratic government in the middle of an economic crisis in the vain hope that massive borrowing and spending will deliver the Hooverville-ites (actual characters in the play) from their slum under the bridge. Reads just like today’s newspaper.

All in all it was a great night with my wonderful wife, and just goes to prove a point that I make every chance I get: you can’t make lousy economics better simply by getting a cute kid to sing about it.

That’s a Funny Thing to Make You Happy [Wisdom from G.K.]

I had often called myself an optimist, to avoid the too evident blasphemy of pessimism. But all the optimism of the age had been false and disheartening for this reason, that it had always been trying to prove that we fit into the world. The Christian optimism is based on the fact that we do not fit into the world. I had tried to be happy by telling myself that man is an animal, like any other which sought its meat from God. But now I really was happy, for I had learnt that man is a monstrosity.

–G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (p. 71)

Fitting Us Like A Glove [Wisdom from G.K.]

I had found this hole in the world: the fact that one must somehow find a way of loving the world without trusting it; somehow one must love the world without being worldly. I found this projecting feature of Christian theology, like a sort of hard spike, the dogmatic insistence that God was personal, and had made a world separate from Himself. The spike of dogma fitted exactly the hole in the world–it had evidently been meant to go there–and then the strange thing began to happen. When once these two parts of the two machines had come together, one after another, all the other parts fitted and fell in with an eerie exactitude.

–G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (p. 70)

Citizen Soldier [Sexualotry]

In a comment on a previous post, Abigail made the astute observation that sin and brutality have always been a part of life in this fallen world. This is a great observation, and one that we should definitely keep in mind.

However, as I noted there (and Abigail agreed), Western Civilization has been remarkably blessed by God in specific, tangible ways, not because Western sinners are less evil than others, but because by God’s grace Western Civilization soaked in the gospel for a thousand years or so. When society takes that kind of bath, it can’t help but come out a little cleaner than before.

Now, when people make claims like that (gospel-saturation has borne positive culture-wide fruit in the West), the first thing that we should ask for is some evidence. “Prove it,” as they say.

So here’s on piece of evidence: throughout most of history, those individuals (predominantly men) who have served in the military have not been noted for their chivalry and honor. In fact, the opposite is often the case.

When the Bible records that a certain Roman centurion loved the subjugated Jews and built them a synagogue (Luke 7:4-5), we are supposed to be surprised. “A centurion did what now?!?” Likewise, the story of Cornelius is meant to stretch our categories just a bit (Acts 10). Parts of the Sermon on the Mount seem to be designed to help followers of Christ deal with oppressive military grunts who would take advantage of the fact that they were licensed to use the sword (Matthew 5:40-41).

And it doesn’t stop with the Bible.

The Third Amendment to the US Constitution strictly prohibits the practice of quartering soldiers in people’s homes without their consent. When citizens were forced to house soldiers in their homes, the soldiers often failed to behave as civilized guests (to say the least).

During the Civil War, Union commanders like John Pope, William Tecumseh Sherman, and Phil Sheridan waged “total war” on their fellow countrymen in the South.

More recently, U.N. peacekeepers have been known to sexually assault refugees in Africa.

Examples could be multiplied of militaries and militias that assault and terrorize peaceful citizens in countries around the world. It’s this fact that makes videos like the one below so remarkable.

Now I have friends in the military; I know that our military has its share of thugs and perverts, as fiascos like Abu Ghraib remind us. However, on the whole, the American people do not fear our military. In many places in the world, if soldiers show up, it’s cause for terror. As the video shows, in the US it’s a cause for relief.

This is a precious reality and a remarkable gift, and one that didn’t come from nowhere. A civilized and chivalrous military that protects rather than exploits doesn’t just happen. And Christians of all people ought to know Whom we have to thank for that.

Welcome Twenty-Two Wordies! [Surprised by Joe]

Welcome, Twenty-Two Wordies! Though I do not always have Abraham’s gift of brevity, I hope you’ll have a look around.

Many of you are that special breed of blog-readers known as “commenters.” Feel free to exercise your unique and very prized gifts wherever you see fit.

You can find an explanation of “Remanations” in the top right corner, a list of categories on the right side of the blog, and top (recent) posts on the left. If you like what you see, you can read by RSS or email.

Thanks for visiting.

The Great Kick-In-The-Pants [Exe-Jesus]

Galatians 5:22-23 describes self-control as a fruit of the Spirit. Other passages teach us that it is the grace of God that trains us to live self-controlled and godly lives in the present evil age (Titus 2:11-14).

So self-control is not mere willpower, but is in fact a result of vital communion with Christ.

When the Spirit produces this wonderful fruit, I find that my greatest temptation is to forget where it came from. I easily forget that self-control is never automatic. I begin to think that I can keep the fruit without remaining attached to the vine, that I can refuse to sow and still wake up and have the harvest waiting for me. The biblical term for that way of thinking is folly.

But God gives a greater grace. The same Spirit that produces self-control also produces gratitude. And gratitude is the great kick-in-the-pants that reminds faith to keep hoping, keep trusting, keep abiding in the living God and his promises.

“In This Corner…” [Cue 'N Ays]

Though I’m somewhat surprised that no one pushed back on my recent prognostication, I guess I’ll have to make do. That just means I’ll probably end up saying more provocative things in the future. I guess you could say that you asked for it. All three of you.

But before addressing possible Christian responses, I thought that the following categorization may help shed some light on why I’m reading the current decline of the West the way that I do.

Aside from biblical trinitarianism, there are two main approaches to ultimate reality: unitarianism and polytheism.

Unitarianism emphasizes the ultimate “oneness” of reality. Diversity, variety, and distinction are all frowned upon. They get in the way of obedience to the Numero Uno. Conformity and submission are the order of the day. The most obvious and prevalent unitarian religion is Islam.

Polytheism emphasizes the variety of approaches to reality. In this view, there are many roads up the mountain, many ways to heaven, etc. Imposition of any one idea is anathema to polytheists. Western multi-culturalism, which is the dominant worldview in Europe and America, is a great example of a polytheistic system.

Now obviously this distinction isn’t foolproof. For instance, most polytheistic societies do have an over-arching singularity, a unity that binds all of the disparate elements together. Hinduism has Brahman, the impersonal ultimate reality from which everything else flows. Ancient Rome was happy to have a huge pantheon, provided that worship of the Roman deities in no way interfered with the affairs of state. The current Western pantheon has Oprah.

Likewise, most unitarian religions have far more diversity than they care to admit. One only has to look at the great varieties of folk Islam found around the world to conclude that Islam is not as monolithic as Muslims would like to think.

Nevertheless, the categorization can be a helpful one. From this starting point, I then offer this premise: If Strong Unitarianism gets in a fight with Weak Polytheism, Strong Unitarianism wins. Every time. One big idea trumps a cacophony of lesser ideas, especially when the big idea also has the advantage of sheer numbers.

So, one way (and it is only a way) to read the current global scene is as a conflict between a Strong Unitarianism (Islam) and a Currently Strong but Increasingly Weakened Polytheism (the West). For the moment, the West (or at least the United States) has roused itself to combat the more barbaric of the Unitarians (radical jihadists) in places like Afghanistan and Iraq.

However, while the US was toppling Saddam and fighting the Taliban, Europe has been slowly surrendering to the Unitarians. And the US went on and elected the Messiah of Multi-culturalism to be President.

So that’s the basic layout as I see it. Now for the $64,000 question: How do the trinitarians approach this conflict, given that a) we are in many ways responsible for the rise of the polytheists, and b) the Unitarians think that we’re on the side of the polytheists, and c) we don’t fight the way that they fight (2 Cor 10:4)?

A Portent of Things to Come? [Sexualotry]

Over the past months I’ve had a recurring thought about the future state of things in the West that I’ve wanted to put out there and solicit feedback. Three recent stories have finally impelled me to take it up. This is a long post (and one that deals with sensitive subjects), but, if you’re willing, I’d love to throw it out there and see what kind of response I get. Questions, comments, and suggestions are welcome.

First, in his talk at the Desiring God Conference for Pastors, Michael Oh made mention of the horrific Japanese sex trade. The online notes to his talk don’t include the details, but you can watch the first 10 minutes to get the basic idea. Here are two of the basic facts he mentioned:

1. The rape and brutalization of thousands of “comfort” women by the Japanese Imperial Army in and around World War II, including the use of forcibly-impregnated women and their children in “scientific” experiments.

2. The thriving Japanese sex trade, involving around 150,000 Filipino and Thai women, young girls, and boys, who are used as sexual objects by perverse men. (He also made mention of the sex trade in other parts of Southeast Asia).

Second, there is this story about the Muslim “grandmother” who convinced young women to become suicide bombers by arranging for them to be raped:

A woman suspected of recruiting more than 80 female suicide bombers has confessed to organizing their rapes so she could later convince them that martyrdom was the only way to escape the shame.

(HT: RedState)

Finally, there is one closer to home. A woman pregnant with a 23-week old baby goes to get an abortion. The doctor is late and the baby is early. Here’s what happened:

One of the clinic’s owners, who has no medical license, cut the infant’s umbilical cord. Williams says the woman placed the baby [alive] in a plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.

Even the pro-choice folks were shocked (however hypocritical there concern may be):

“It really disturbed me,” said Joanne Sterner, president of the Broward County chapter of the National Organization for Women, after reviewing the administrative complaint against Renelique. “I know that there are clinics out there like this. And I hope that we can keep (women) from going to these types of clinics.”

(HT: RedState)

All three of these stories help me to understand the Pauline admonition in Romans 12:9: “Abhor what is evil.” “Outrage” seems like a tame word when I describe what I feel when I think about the callous evil displayed in these acts. And all three of them lead me to make a (tentative) judgment about where we’re headed.

(DISCLAIMER: I am not a prophet, nor even the grandson of one. I’m just trying to humbly learn to “interpret the present time.” Whether or not this is what the New Testament calls “prophecy,” the principle of 1 Thessalonians 5:20-21 still applies: “Do not despise prophecies; but test everything; hold fast what is good.” It’s in that spirit that I make the following analysis.)

These three events (along with other indicators) lead me to think that these sorts of things will become more common in the near future, unless God is massively gracious to us. And by “these sorts of things” I mean the combination of disturbing sexuality and shocking brutality, particularly against women and children. I see two primary factors at work here, and I see them at work a lot.

1. The spread of openly idolatrous religions and ideologies in much of the world. I have in mind everything from Islam to Eastern religions to resurgent neo-paganism to humanistic atheistic secularism. What all of these religions have in common is a rejection of the living triune God. Along with that rejection comes the absence of the significance of human beings as creatures made in God’s image.

The mistreatment of women in Islam is fairly common knowledge. From honor killings to the forced circumcision of young girls to the tolerance and promotion of wife beating, Islam has a brutal streak that often finds exercise upon women. And when I say Islam, I don’t mean all Muslims. Many Muslim men are good and honorable husbands and fathers who protect and provide for their families (and they are so because of God’s common grace).

However, there is a tolerance for sexually-related violence in Islam that can shock the sensibilities of those of us in the West. I’m no expert in Islam, but I wonder if such violence is rooted in Islam’s view of a unitarian god who demands absolute submission to his arbitrary will from human creatures who do not have the worth and value that they do in reality.

The tolerance of sexual brutality among Eastern religions can be seen in the thriving sex trade in Asia. Paganism has a long history of interweaving sexuality and spirituality in shockingly wicked ways (For evidence, see Peter Jones The God of Sex: How Spirituality Defines Your Sexuality). And, of course, in atheistic humanism, there is no god to speak of, and human beings are nothing more than highly-evolved apes whose value is derived purely from sociological constructs that we can create and dismember as we choose.

So factor one is the brutality and inhumanity of the current idolatries that are spreading.

2. The second factor is the inability of so-called Western civilization to resist this brutality. The West is simply ill-equipped to deal with
the kind of brutality that exists in much of the world. The civility and assumptions about human dignity that linger in the West are owing to our Christian history. They are the fruit of the penetration of the gospel over hundreds of years. The great folly of our time (as in most times) is the notion that we can sever the root of faith in the living God and his Son Jesus Christ and keep the fruit of human dignity, respect for women, and sexual boundaries.

In other words, ours is a failure to say “Thank you” to God for his marvelous gift of a Christian heritage. And when human beings fail to honor God as God and give him thanks for his abundant goodness to us, God judges them. And his judgment often consists in the giving over of human beings to all manner of debauchery and sin. The sexualotry of our current society is not just something for which we will be judged later (when Jesus returns); it is itself a judgment on us now.

The society-wide rejection of the biblical God (which began to take place a couple of centuries ago) has led to the gradual abandonment of a biblical understanding of manhood and womanhood, the feminization of the West, and the subsequent pornification of our culture. Untethered from the right worship of the living God through Jesus Christ, notions of sexuality have continually pushed the boundaries. Such pushing has, for a time, existed in a society still “Christ-haunted,” that is, one in which the lingering memory of a Christian past allows for the protection of the weak (e.g. women and children) in the midst of growing rebellion.

At some point, however, the culture finally “gives up the ghost.” Apart from the connection to the root, the fruit of the gospel (dignity, respect, honor) dies on the vine. When the protection that our Christ-haunted past affords us is gone, there will be no longer any barrier to the sexual exploitation and brutalization of the weak.

I’ve noted before that cultural elites are more than happy to use “women’s issues” to amass power for themselves, but that they don’t actually care for women. I’ve heard Doug Wilson point to this exact phenomenon by noting that feminists have convinced women to forsake the God-designed protection and provision of husbands and fathers for the selective and inept “protection” and “provision” of the all-powerful State.

Women have been taught to “liberate” themselves from those to whom God has entrusted them and instead seek asylum in a nameless and faceless bureaucracy. But the bureaucracy isn’t as much interested in caring for real women as it is in solidifying its power through protection of the “women’s issue.” It’s amazing how many women can be slaughtered in the name of women’s rights.

So, to wrap up this post that has gone on far too long, in the near future I see an increase in the level of sexual violence against the weak and voiceless, born and unborn, as the cultural elites seek to make peace with the brutal realities of a post-Christian world. I offer this analysis, knowing that it will probably provoke questions and objections on a number of issues. I’m not completely convinced of everything I’ve written and am open to correction on any number of points. So feel free to probe and push back, if you feel so inclined.

I’ll have more thoughts on how Christians can respond and live wisely in a world like this in future posts. For now, I simply commend prayers and petitions for those around the world already swept up in the flood of human wickedness and rebellion. Christ is our Lord, and he is still mighty to save.

The World Is God’s Play [Wisdom from G.K.]

According to most philosophers, God in making the world enslaved it. According to Christianity, in making it, He set it free. God had written, not so much a poem, but rather a play; a play he had planned as perfect, but which had necessarily been left to human actors and stage-managers, who had since made a great mess of it.

–G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (p. 69)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.